Browsing by Author "Burke, Emily"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Family Navigator: A pilot intervention to support intensive care unit family surrogates
    (American Association of Critical Care Nurses, 2016-11) Torke, Alexia M.; Wocial, Lucia D.; Johns, Shelley A.; Sachs, Greg A.; Callahan, Christopher M.; Bosslet, Gabriel T.; Slaven, James E.; Perkins, Susan M.; Hickman, Susan E.; Montz, Kianna; Burke, Emily; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Although communication problems between family surrogates and intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians have been documented, there are few effective interventions. Nurses have the potential to play an expanded role in ICU communication and decision making. Objectives To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of the Family Navigator (FN), a distinct nursing role to address family members’ unmet communication needs early in an ICU stay. Methods An inter-disciplinary team developed the FN protocol. A randomized controlled pilot intervention trial of the FN was performed in a tertiary referral hospital ICU to test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. The intervention addressed informational and emotional communication needs through daily contact using structured clinical updates, emotional and informational support modules, family meeting support and follow-up phone calls. Results Twenty-six surrogate/patient pairs (13 per study arm) were enrolled. Surrogates randomized to the intervention had contact with the FN 90% or more of eligible patient days. All surrogates agreed or strongly agreed that they would recommend the FN to other families. Open-ended comments from both surrogates and clinicians were uniformly positive. For both groups, 100% of baseline data collection interviews and 81% of 6–8 week follow-up interviews were completed. Conclusions A fully integrated nurse empowered to facilitate decision making is a feasible intervention in the ICU setting. It is well-received by ICU families and staff. A larger randomized controlled trial is needed to demonstrate an impact on important outcomes, such as surrogate well-being and decision quality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Non-Traditional Surrogate Decision Makers for Hospitalized Older Adults
    (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2018-04) Comer, Amber R.; Slaven, James E.; Montz, Annie; Burke, Emily; Inger, Lev; Torke, Alexia; Robert H. Mckinney School of Law
    Background Without advanced preparation of legal documents, state law determines who may serve as a surrogate decision maker for patients in hospitals. Objectives To examine the relationship characteristics associated with traditional versus non-traditional healthcare surrogates who are making medical decisions for patients in hospitals. Research Design Secondary analysis of a baseline cross-sectional survey of a larger prospective observational study. Subjects 364 patient/ surrogate dyads consisting of patients age 65 years and older admitted to the medical or medical ICU services who lacked decision making capacity based on a physician assessment and also had a surrogate available. Results This study of surrogate decision makers for hospitalized older adults found that the relationships of non-traditional surrogates such as, nieces, nephews, and friends serving in the surrogate role is nearly identical to those of traditional, first degree relatives serving as a surrogate. Over two-thirds (71.2%) of non-traditional surrogates saw the patient in person at least weekly compared to 80.8% of legal surrogates (p-value .9023). Almost all traditional and non-traditional surrogates discussed the patient’s medical preferences with the patient (96.9% of legal surrogates and 89.2% of non-traditional surrogates; p=0.0510). Conclusion This study shows that both traditional and non-traditional surrogates, who are a patient’s primary care giver have similar relationships with patients. The findings of this study suggest that requiring family members such as grandchildren to take the extra step of formal appointment through a legal channel may not be necessary to protect patients. Therefore, broader state laws expanding the list of surrogates authorized by state statute to include more non-traditional surrogates may be necessary.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey
    (Elsevier, 2017-01) Torke, Alexia M.; Monahan, Patrick; Callahan, Christopher M.; Helft, Paul R.; Sachs, Greg A.; Wocial, Lucia D.; Slaven, James E.; Montz, Kianna; Inger, Lev; Burke, Emily; Medicine, School of Medicine
    CONTEXT: Although many family members who make surrogate decisions report problems with communication, there is no validated instrument to accurately measure surrogate/clinician communication for older adults in the acute hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to validate a survey of surrogate-rated communication quality in the hospital that would be useful to clinicians, researchers, and health systems. METHODS: After expert review and cognitive interviewing (n = 10 surrogates), we enrolled 350 surrogates (250 development sample and 100 validation sample) of hospitalized adults aged 65 years and older from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. The communication survey and a measure of decision quality were administered within hospital days 3 and 10. Mental health and satisfaction measures were administered six to eight weeks later. RESULTS: Factor analysis showed support for both one-factor (Total Communication) and two-factor models (Information and Emotional Support). Item reduction led to a final 30-item scale. For the validation sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.96 (total), 0.94 (Information), and 0.90 (Emotional Support). Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were adequate (one-factor model, comparative fit index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.62, weighted root mean square residual = 1.011; two-factor model comparative fit index = 0.984, root mean square error of approximation = 0.055, weighted root mean square residual = 0.930). Total score and subscales showed significant associations with the Decision Conflict Scale (Pearson correlation -0.43, P < 0.001 for total score). Emotional Support was associated with improved mental health outcomes at six to eight weeks, such as anxiety (-0.19 P < 0.001), and Information was associated with satisfaction with the hospital stay (0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The survey shows high reliability and validity in measuring communication experiences for hospital surrogates. The scale has promise for measurement of communication quality and is predictive of important outcomes, such as surrogate satisfaction and well-being.