Browsing by Author "Hsueh, Loretta"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Associations between immigrant status and pharmacological treatments for diabetes in U.S. adults(APA, 2018) Hsueh, Loretta; Vrany, Elizabeth A.; Patel, Jay S.; Hollingshead, Nicole A.; Hirsh, Adam T.; de Groot, Mary; Stewart, Jesse C.; Psychology, School of ScienceObjectives: Although treatment disparities in diabetes have been documented along racial/ethnic lines, it is unclear if immigrant groups in the United States experience similar treatment disparities. Our objective was to determine whether immigrant status is associated with differences in pharmacological treatment of diabetes in a nationally representative sample of adults with diabetes. We were specifically interested in differences in treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) and insulin. Method: Respondents were 2,260 adults from National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2012 with a self-reported diabetes diagnosis. Immigrant status was indicated by birth within (U.S.-born) or outside (foreign-born) the 50 U.S. States or Washington, DC. Multinomial logistic regression analyses examined associations between immigrant status and (a) treatment with OHAs only and (b) treatment with insulin only or insulin and OHA combination therapy, using no treatment as the reference group. Results: Adjusting for demographics, diabetes severity and duration, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and CVD risk factors, being foreign-born versus U.S.-born was not associated with treatment with OHAs only (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.97, 2.60]). However, being foreign-born was associated with decreased odds (OR = 0.53; 95% CI [0.28, 0.99]) of treatment with insulin. Conclusions: Pharmacological treatment of diabetes differs along immigrant status lines. To understand these findings, studies capturing the processes underlying treatment differences in diabetes among immigrants are needed. Findings raise the possibility that integrating information about a patient’s immigrant status, in addition to racial/ethnic identity, may be an important component of culturally sensitive diabetes care.Item Depressive Symptom Severity as a Predictor of Attendance in the HOME Behavioral Weight Loss Trial(Elsevier, 2020-04) Shell, Aubrey L.; Hsueh, Loretta; Vrany, Elizabeth A.; Clark, Daniel O.; Keith, NiCole R.; Xu, Huiping; Stewart, Jesse C.; Psychology, School of ScienceObjective We examined whether total depressive symptoms and symptom clusters predicted behavioral weight loss attendance among economically disadvantaged adults in a randomized controlled trial. Methods 150 adults with obesity were randomized to 12 months of in-person, video conference, or enhanced usual care weight loss groups. We categorized percent session attendance in the intervention arms into three levels: no attendance, poorer attendance, and better attendance. Results Higher baseline Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) score was associated with a greater odds of being in the poorer versus better attendance group (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.02–3.69, p = .04). A similar relationship between PHQ-8 score and odds of being in the no attendance versus better attendance group was observed but was not statistically significant (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 0.94–2.81, p = .08). Both cognitive/affective and somatic clusters contributed to the depressive symptoms-attendance relationships. Conclusion Greater depressive symptoms at the start of a behavioral weight loss program may predict poorer subsequent session attendance. Screening for and addressing depression may improve intervention uptake.Item Diabetes Risk Perception Among Immigrant and Racial/Ethnic Minority Adults in the United States(Sage, 2019) Hsueh, Loretta; Peña, Juan M.; Hirsh, Adam T.; de Groot, Mary; Stewart, Jesse C.; Psychology, School of SciencePurpose The purpose of the study was to examine associations of immigrant and racial/ethnic status with diabetes risk perception among a population-based sample of US adults without diabetes. Racial/ethnic minorities are at increased risk of developing diabetes. Emerging research shows that immigrant (foreign born) individuals are also at increased risk, but less is understood about risk perception in this group. Methods Respondents were 11,569 adults from the NHANES (2011-2016; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) reporting no diabetes or prediabetes. Immigrant status was coded as foreign born or US born and analyses used NHANES racial/ethnic categories: white, black, Mexican American, other Hispanic, Asian, and other/multiracial. Immigrant status and variables comparing each minority group with whites were simultaneously entered into models predicting risk perception (yes/no), adjusting for demographic and diabetes risk factors. Results Being foreign born was associated with decreased odds of perceived risk, while being Mexican American, Asian, and other/multiracial were associated with increased odds of perceived risk. Discussion Foreign-born adults are less likely than US-born adults to report perceived risk for diabetes. Lower diabetes risk perception among immigrants could result in poorer preventative behaviors and later diabetes detection.Item Influence of Patient Immigrant Status on Provider Diabetes Treatment Decisions: A Virtual Human Experimental Study(2020-08) Hsueh, Loretta; Stewart, Jesse C.; Hirsh, Adam T.; Zapolski, Tamika; de Groot, Mary; Mather, Kieren J.Immigrants are at elevated risk for not having their diabetes treatment appropriately intensified, likely resulting in poorly-controlled diabetes and increased morbidity and mortality. Immigrant status is a powerful sociodemographic cue, yet its influence on providers’ diabetes treatment decisions is unknown. The study objective was to determine the effect of patient immigrant status on providers’ decisions to (1) take no action, (2) add an oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA), (3) add/switch to insulin, or (4) refer the patient to an endocrinologist. Participants were 140 medical students/professionals (‘providers’). Providers viewed profiles (videos + vignettes) for virtual patients differing in immigrant status (born in Mexico or U.S.; other characteristics held constant). Analyses were completed at the group (‘nomothetic’) and individual (‘idiographic’) levels. Nomothetic results indicated providers were less likely to refer foreign-born patients to endocrinology than U.S.-born patients (p=0.03). No differences were detected for the other three treatment likelihood ratings. Idiographic results indicated that about half of provider decisions were influenced by patient immigrant status (i.e., Cohen’s d≥0.50) across all four treatment decisions. Effect size data show an almost even split between higher treatment ratings for foreign-born vs. U.S.-born patients for three decisions (take no action, add an OHA, add/switch to insulin), explaining why group-level differences for these ratings did not emerge (i.e., they were cancelled out). This study found that providers are less likely to refer foreign-born patients to endocrinology, potentially leading to therapeutic inertia. In addition, half of individual-level provider decisions were meaningfully influenced by patient immigrant status. However, traditional group-level analyses mask these important individual-level differences. These systematic differences in treatment based on non-relevant factors could lead to unintended adverse outcomes for the foreign-born population.Item Patient–Provider Language Concordance and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Evidence Map, and Research Agenda(Sage, 2019) Hsueh, Loretta; Hirsh, Adam T.; Maupomé, Gerardo; Stewart, Jesse C.; Psychology, School of ScienceAlthough patient–provider language concordance has the potential to reduce health disparities for people with limited English proficiency, no previous work has synthesized this literature. Our systematic review sought to describe the characteristics of studies examining relationships between language concordance and health outcomes, summarize the nature of observed associations, and propose an evidence map and research agenda. A comprehensive search of published articles identified 38 quantitative studies for inclusion. Most studies were cross-sectional, conducted in primary care, concentrated in Western states, and focused on Spanish speakers and physician providers. Results were split between supporting a positive association versus no association of language concordance with patient behaviors, provider behaviors, interpersonal processes of care, and clinical outcomes. Several methodological limitations were identified. Based on these results, we developed an evidence map, identified knowledge gaps, and proposed a research agenda. There is a particular need for quasi-experimental longitudinal studies with well-characterized samples.Item Undiagnosed diabetes among immigrant and racial/ethnic minority adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2018(Elsevier, 2020) Hsueh, Loretta; Wu, Wei; Hirsh, Adam T.; de Groot, Mary; Mather, Kieren J.; Stewart, Jesse C.; Psychology, School of SciencePurpose Undiagnosed diabetes disproportionately affects medically underserved groups. It is unknown whether being an immigrant confers additional risk for undiagnosed diabetes. The purpose of this study was to examine independent associations of immigrant status and race/ethnicity with the prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes in a U.S.-based population sample. Methods Respondents were 21,306 adults from the 2011–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Immigrant status was coded as foreign-born or U.S.-born. Six racial/ethnic categories were white, Black, Mexican American, other Hispanic, Asian, and other/multiracial. Self-report and laboratory data yielded a three-level diabetes status outcome: no diabetes (88%), diagnosed diabetes (10%), and undiagnosed diabetes (2%). Results Adjusted multinomial logistic regression models evaluating immigrant status and race/ethnicity as simultaneous predictors revealed that foreign-born (vs. U.S.-born) adults had a similar prevalence of diagnosed diabetes (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.79–1.22, P = .84) but a higher prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.21–1.97, P = .004). Models showed that all racial/ethnic minority groups except the other/multiracial group (vs. whites) had a higher prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes (Ps < .04). Conclusions Immigrants and racial/ethnic minority adults have increased odds of undiagnosed diabetes, even after accounting for health insurance. These groups are likely at increased risk for diabetes complications because of prolonged periods of undetected diabetes.