Browsing by Author "Jagannath, Sundar"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effect of initial treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma without immediate stem cell transplant intent: results from the Connect ® MM Registry
    (Wiley, 2021-04) Abonour, Rafat; Rifkin, Robert M.; Gasparetto, Cristina; Toomey, Kathleen; Durie, Brian G.M.; Hardin, James W.; Terebelo, Howard R.; Jagannath, Sundar; Narang, Mohit; Ailawadhi, Sikander; Omel, James L.; Lee, Hans C.; Srinivasan, Shankar; Kitali, Amani; Agarwal, Amit; Wagner, Lynne; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Although new multiple myeloma (MM) therapies are effective in alleviating some disease-associated symptoms (e.g. bone pain, fatigue, functional decline), they can result in additional toxicities, further impacting health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Here, we compared HRQoL and safety of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone [RVd (n = 445)], bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone [VMP (n = 77)] and Vd or VMP (n = 588) in patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) from the Connect® MM Registry, a large, USA, multicentre, prospective observational cohort study. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Multiple Myeloma subscale, EuroQol-5D overall score and Bone Pain Inventory HRQoL scores were significantly improved with RVd versus Vd/VMP. Serious adverse event rates were similar in all groups. Treatment with RVd maintained HRQoL in this real-world, largely community-based population of patients with NDMM.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Heterogeneity of Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the Connect MM Registry (2010-2016)
    (Elsevier, 2018-07-01) Jagannath, Sundar; Abonour, Rafat; Durie, Brian G. M.; Gasparetto, Cristina; Hardin, James W.; Narang, Mohit; Terebelo, Howard R.; Toomey, Kathleen; Wagner, Lynne; Srinivasan, Shankar; Kitali, Amani; Yue, Lihua; Flick, E. Dawn; Agarwal, Amit; Rifkin, Robert M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) has undergone recent changes with the regulatory approval of several new therapies indicated for second- and later-line disease. Using data from Connect MM, the largest multisite, primarily community-based, prospective, observational registry of MM patients in the United States, selection of second-line treatments was evaluated during a 5-year period from 2010 to 2016. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had newly diagnosed MM ≤ 2 months before study entry, and were followed for up to 8 years. Patients who received ≥ 2 lines of therapy were analyzed. “Tepee” plots of stacked area graphs differentiated treatments by color to allow visualization of second-line treatment trends in MM patients. Results As of February 2017, 855 of 2897 treated patients had progressed to second-line treatment. Treatment selection was heterogeneous; shifting patterns of treatment choices coincided with the approval status of newer agents. The most common treatment regimens in the early part of the decade were lenalidomide and/or bortezomib, with or without dexamethasone, with increasing use of newer agents (carfilzomib, pomalidomide, daratumumab, and elotuzumab) and triplet combinations over time. The influence of the baseline patient characteristics of age, history of diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, and renal function on treatment choice was also examined. Conclusion These findings indicate that community physicians are current in their MM management practices, with uptake of new drugs and acquaintance with results of randomized clinical trials using combinations almost concurrent with their regulatory approval and publication.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of post-transplantation maintenance therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma: data from the Connect® MM Registry
    (Springer, 2018-12) Abonour, Rafat; Wagner, Lynne; Durie, Brian G.M.; Jagannath, Sundar; Narang, Mohit; Terebelo, Howard R.; Gasparetto, Cristina J.; Toomey, Kathleen; Hardin, James W.; Kitali, Amani; Gibson, Craig J.; Srinivasan, Shankar; Swern, Arlene S.; Rifkin, Robert M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is recommended for use in multiple myeloma (MM); however, more data are needed on its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Presented here is an analysis of HRQoL in a Connect MM registry cohort of patients who received ASCT ± maintenance therapy. The Connect MM Registry is one of the earliest and largest, active, observational, prospective US registry of patients with symptomatic newly diagnosed MM. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-MM (FACT-MM) version 4, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire, and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at study entry and quarterly thereafter until death or study discontinuation. Patients in three groups were analyzed: any maintenance therapy (n = 244), lenalidomide-only maintenance therapy (n = 169), and no maintenance therapy (n = 137); any maintenance and lenalidomide-only maintenance groups were not mutually exclusive. There were no significant differences in change from pre-ASCT baseline between any maintenance (P = 0.60) and lenalidomide-only maintenance (P = 0.72) versus no maintenance for the FACT-MM total score. There were also no significant differences in change from pre-ASCT baseline between any maintenance and lenalidomide-only maintenance versus no maintenance for EQ-5D overall index, BPI, FACT-MM Trial Outcomes Index, and myeloma subscale scores. In all three groups, FACT-MM, EQ-5D Index, and BPI scores improved after ASCT; FACT-MM and BPI scores deteriorated at disease progression. These data suggest that post-ASCT any maintenance or lenalidomide-only maintenance does not negatively impact patients' HRQoL. Additional research is needed to verify these findings.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Multiple Myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update
    (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2018) Anderson, Kenneth; Ismaila, Nofisat; Flynn, Patrick J.; Halabi, Susan; Jagannath, Sundar; Ogaily, Mohammed S.; Omel, Jim; Raje, Noopur; Roodman, G. David; Yee, Gary C.; Kyle, Robert A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose To update guideline recommendations on the role of bone-modifying agents in multiple myeloma. Methods An update panel conducted a targeted systematic literature review by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical practice guidelines, and observational studies. Results Thirty-five relevant studies were identified, and updated evidence supports the current recommendations. Recommendations For patients with active symptomatic multiple myeloma that requires systemic therapy with or without evidence of lytic destruction of bone or compression fracture of the spine from osteopenia on plain radiograph(s) or other imaging studies, intravenous administration of pamidronate 90 mg over at least 2 hours or zoledronic acid 4 mg over at least 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended. Denosumab has shown to be noninferior to zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal-related events and provides an alternative. Fewer adverse events related to renal toxicity have been noted with denosumab compared with zoledronic acid and may be preferred in this setting. The update panel recommends that clinicians consider reducing the initial pamidronate dose in patients with preexisting renal impairment. Zoledronic acid has not been studied in patients with severe renal impairment and is not recommended in this setting. The update panel suggests that bone-modifying treatment continue for up to 2 years. Less frequent dosing has been evaluated and should be considered in patients with responsive or stable disease. Continuous use is at the discretion of the treating physician and the risk of ongoing skeletal morbidity. Retreatment should be initiated at the time of disease relapse. The update panel discusses measures regarding osteonecrosis of the jaw.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and acute leukemia
    (BioMed Central, 2016-12-20) Boyiadzis, Michael; Bishop, Michael R.; Abonour, Rafat; Anderson, Kenneth C.; Ansell, Stephen M.; Avigan, David; Barbarotta, Lisa; Barrett, Austin John; Van Besien, Koen; Bergsagel, Leif; Borrello, Ivan; Brody, Joshua; Brufsky, Jill; Cairo, Mitchell; Chari, Ajai; Cohen, Adam; Cortes, Jorge; Forman, Stephen J.; Friedberg, Jonathan W.; Fuchs, Ephraim J.; Gore, Steven D.; Jagannath, Sundar; Kahl, Brad S; Kline, Justin; Kochenderfer, James N.; Kwak, Larry W.; Levy, Ronald; de Lima, Marcos; Litzow, Mark R.; Mahindra, Anuj; Miller, Jeffrey; Munshi, Nikhil C.; Orlowski, Robert Z.; Pagel, John M.; Porter, David L.; Russell, Stephen J.; Schwartz, Karl; Shipp, Margaret A.; Siegel, David; Stone, Richard M.; Tallman, Martin S.; Timmerman, John M.; Van Rhee, Frits; Waller, Edmund K.; Welsh, Ann; Werner, Michael; Wiernik, Peter H.; Dhodapkar, Madhav V.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Increasing knowledge concerning the biology of hematologic malignancies as well as the role of the immune system in the control of these diseases has led to the development and approval of immunotherapies that are resulting in impressive clinical responses. Therefore, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a hematologic malignancy Cancer Immunotherapy Guidelines panel consisting of physicians, nurses, patient advocates, and patients to develop consensus recommendations for the clinical application of immunotherapy for patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and acute leukemia. These recommendations were developed following the previously established process based on the Institute of Medicine’s clinical practice guidelines. In doing so, a systematic literature search was performed for high-impact studies from 2004 to 2014 and was supplemented with further literature as identified by the panel. The consensus panel met in December of 2014 with the goal to generate consensus recommendations for the clinical use of immunotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies. During this meeting, consensus panel voting along with discussion were used to rate and review the strength of the supporting evidence from the literature search. These consensus recommendations focus on issues related to patient selection, toxicity management, clinical endpoints, and the sequencing or combination of therapies. Overall, immunotherapy is rapidly emerging as an effective therapeutic strategy for the management of hematologic malignances. Evidence-based consensus recommendations for its clinical application are provided and will be updated as the field evolves.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Treatment Outcomes and Health Care Resource Utilization in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Receiving Lenalidomide-only Maintenance, Any Maintenance, or No Maintenance: Results from the Connect MM Registry
    (Elsevier, 2018-07-01) Rifkin, Robert M.; Jagannath, Sundar; Durie, Brian G. M.; Narang, Mohit; Terebelo, Howard R.; Gasparetto, Cristina J.; Toomey, Kathleen; Hardin, James W.; Wagner, Lynne; Parikh, Kejal; Abouzaid, Safiya; Srinivasan, Shankar; Kitali, Amani; Zafar, Faiza; Abonour, Rafat; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose Maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM), but the effect of continued treatment with lenalidomide-only maintenance, or any maintenance, on health care resource utilization (HCRU) is largely unknown. Methods Here we present an analysis of HCRU and clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients from the Connect MM registry, the largest, ongoing, observational, prospective US registry of patients with symptomatic newly diagnosed MM. In this study, patients with newly diagnosed MM who completed induction and single ASCT without subsequent consolidation received lenalidomide-only maintenance (n = 180), any maintenance (n = 256), or no maintenance (n = 165). HCRU (hospitalization, surgery/procedures, and concurrent medications [growth factors, bisphosphonates, or neuropathic pain medication]) was assessed starting from 100 days post-ASCT for up to 2 years. Findings Although the rates of hospitalization per 100 person-years were similar across groups at the end of years 1 and 2, the median duration of hospitalization was numerically longer with no maintenance. The rates of use of growth factors, bisphosphonates, and neuropathic pain medication were generally similar in all 3 groups. The receipt of any maintenance was associated with significantly reduced use of neuropathic pain medications during year 1. Of note, lenalidomide-only maintenance was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (54.5 vs 30.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43–0.79; P = 0.0005) and overall survival (OS) (median OS not reached in either group; HR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28–0.73; P = 0.001) compared with no maintenance. Likewise, the group treated with any maintenance had significantly longer median progression-free survival (44.7 vs 30.4 months; HR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47–0.82; P = 0.0008) and OS (median OS not reached in either group; HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33–0.76; P = 0.001) than did the group that did not receive maintenance. Implications These findings suggest that in this largely community-based study population, post-ASCT maintenance therapy, including lenalidomide-only maintenance, improves clinical outcomes without negatively affecting HCRU. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01081028.