Browsing by Author "Legault, Gary L."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Gender Differences in Case Volume Among Ophthalmology Residents
    (American Medical Association, 2019-07-18) Gong, Dan; Winn, Bryan J.; Beal, Casey J.; Blomquist, Preston H.; Chen, Royce W.; Culican, Susan M.; Dagi Glass, Lora R.; Domeracki, Gary F.; Goshe, Jeffrey M.; Jones, Jeremy K.; Khouri, Albert S.; Legault, Gary L.; Martin, Timothy J.; Mitchell, Kelly T.; Naseri, Ayman; Oetting, Thomas A.; Olson, Joshua H.; Pettey, Jeff H.; Reinoso, Maria A.; Reynolds, Andrew L.; Siatkowski, R. Michael; SooHoo, Jeffrey R.; Sun, Grace; Syed, Misha F.; Tao, Jeremiah P.; Taravati, Parisa; WuDunn, Darrell; Al-Aswad, Lama A.; Ophthalmology, School of Medicine
    Question Do differences in cataract surgery and total procedural volume exist between US male and female residents during ophthalmology residency training? Findings This analysis of the case logs of 1271 ophthalmology residents from 24 US ophthalmology residency programs estimates that female residents performed 7.8 to 22.2 fewer cataract operations and 36.0 to 80.2 fewer total procedures compared with their male counterparts from 2005 to 2017, and the gap widened during this period for total procedural volume. Meaning The current state of surgical training in ophthalmology residency programs deserves further study to ensure that male and female residents have equivalent training experiences. Go to: Abstract Importance Although almost equal numbers of male and female medical students enter into ophthalmology residency programs, whether they have similar surgical experiences during training is unclear. Objective To determine differences for cataract surgery and total procedural volume between male and female residents during ophthalmology residency. Design, Setting, Participants This retrospective, longitudinal analysis of resident case logs from 24 US ophthalmology residency programs spanned July 2005 to June 2017. A total of 1271 residents were included. Data were analyzed from August 12, 2017, through April 4, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Variables analyzed included mean volumes of cataract surgery and total procedures, resident gender, and maternity or paternity leave status. Results Among the 1271 residents included in the analysis (815 men [64.1%]), being female was associated with performing fewer cataract operations and total procedures. Male residents performed a mean (SD) of 176.7 (66.2) cataract operations, and female residents performed a mean (SD) of 161.7 (56.2) (mean difference, −15.0 [95% CI, −22.2 to −7.8]; P < .001); men performed a mean (SD) of 509.4 (208.6) total procedures and women performed a mean (SD) of 451.3 (158.8) (mean difference, −58.1 [95% CI, −80.2 to −36.0]; P < .001). Eighty-five of 815 male residents (10.4%) and 71 of 456 female residents (15.6%) took parental leave. Male residents who took paternity leave performed a mean of 27.5 (95% CI, 13.3 to 41.6; P < .001) more cataract operations compared with men who did not take leave, but female residents who took maternity leave performed similar numbers of operations as women who did not take leave (mean difference, −2.0 [95% CI, −18.0 to 14.0]; P = .81). From 2005 to 2017, each additional year was associated with a 5.5 (95% CI, 4.4 to 6.7; P < .001) increase in cataract volume and 24.4 (95% CI, 20.9 to 27.8; P < .001) increase in total procedural volume. This increase was not different between genders for cataract procedure volume (β = −1.6 [95% CI, −3.7 to 0.4]; P = .11) but was different for total procedural volume such that the increase in total procedural volume over time for men was greater than that for women (β = −8.0 [95% CI, −14.0 to −2.1]; P = .008). Conclusions and Relevance Female residents performed 7.8 to 22.2 fewer cataract operations and 36.0 to 80.2 fewer total procedures compared with their male counterparts from 2005 to 2017, a finding that warrants further exploration to ensure that residents have equivalent surgical training experiences during residency regardless of gender. However, this study included a limited number of programs (24 of 119 [20.2%]). Future research including all ophthalmology residency programs may minimize the selection bias issues present in this study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Patient Perception of Physician Attire in a Military Ophthalmology Clinic
    (Cureus, 2021-01-04) Scheive, Melanie; Gillis, John, II.; Gillis, Sarah; Legault, Gary L.; Ophthalmology, School of Medicine
    The purpose of this study is to investigate patient preferences of physician attire in an outpatient military ophthalmology clinic to determine how these preferences affect patients' perceptions of physician competence and their overall clinical experience. Materials and methods This study is a prospective survey administered to patients at the ophthalmology clinic at Brooke Army Medical Center. USA. Patients who were willing to participate in a volunteer survey were included in this study. Demographic information and survey questions were utilized in this study along with words and pictures for patients to select a preference in physician attire in the clinic setting (scrubs, military uniform, or civilian professional attire) and surgical setting (surgical cap or a surgical bouffant). The survey asks patients if physician attire impacts patient confidence in physician abilities (yes or no) and if surgeon attire impacts the likelihood of the patient taking the surgeon's advice (yes or no). Results The demographic distribution includes 57-77 years old participants (53%), females (61%), retirees (49%), and dependent spouses (40%). The racial distribution includes 46% - Caucasian, 20% - African American, 22% - Hispanic, 6 - % Asian, and 6% - other. Most patient appointment types were established follow-up (77%) with only 12% new and 11% walk-in. The survey results (N=308) indicate that most patients (64%) did not have a preference in physician clinical attire, while 22% preferred scrubs, 11% preferred military uniform, and 3% preferred civilian attire. Most patients (66%) did not have a preference for surgical headwear, while 27% preferred the surgical cap, and 7% preferred the surgical bouffant. Only 9% of the patients surveyed indicated that physician attire impacted their confidence in their physician's ability, and 12% reported that attire impacted the likelihood of taking advice. Conclusions Most patients in an outpatient military ophthalmology clinic do not have a preference for physician attire or surgical headwear when surveyed. The majority of patients did not feel physician attire impacted their perception of physician's ability or their likelihood of taking advice. When indicating a preference, patients tended to prefer scrubs to outpatient civilian attire or military attire and trended towards preferring surgical cap over surgical bouffant for headwear.