Marianne Matthias

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1805/6817

Making Treatment Decisions with Your Healthcare Provider

Dr. Matthias and her colleagues are working to develop an intervention to improve shared decision making in chronic pain and mental health care. She is collecting observational and interview data from these two care settings to identify strengths and weaknesses in communication and how communicating treatment decisions can be improved to better involve collaboration and equality between patients and providers. Once the data from the observations is analyzed, it will be used to design and test an intervention to improve shared decision making. The next step will then be implementing this intervention in clinics.

Browse

Now showing 1 - 10 of 25

Factors underlying metastatic breast cancer patients' perceptions of symptom importance: a qualitative analysis
(Wiley, 2018-01) Mosher, Catherine E.; Daily, Susan; Tometich, Danielle; Matthias, Marianne S.; Outcalt, Samantha D.; Hirsh, Adam; Johns, Shelley A.; Rand, Kevin; Schneider, Bryan; Mina, Lida; Storniolo, Anna Maria; Newton, Erin; Miller, Kathy; Psychology, School of Science
The symptom literature in cancer has primarily examined symptom severity, frequency and distress. Assessing cancer patients' perceptions of symptom importance-how important it is for them to see improvement in a symptom following an intervention-and factors influencing these judgments would also inform patient-centred care, but this analysis has not been undertaken. This qualitative study aimed to identify factors underlying perceptions of symptom importance among 25 symptomatic metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Participants were recruited from a cancer centre in the Midwestern USA. Semi-structured interviews focused on patients' rationale for considering common symptoms (i.e., anxiety, sadness, sleep problems, pain or fatigue) to be important. Thematic analyses revealed five interrelated factors underlying MBC patients' perceptions of symptom importance: activity restriction, concentration difficulties, exacerbation of other physical symptoms, symptom-related long-term health concerns and negative impact on their relationships with others. Patients most frequently stated that a physical or psychological symptom was important because of the resulting activity restriction. Additionally, some patients considered pain to be important because it signalled potential long-term health concerns, such as worsening metastatic disease. Findings suggest that clinicians should take into account MBC patients' perceptions of symptom importance and factors underlying these judgments when making shared treatment decisions.
A Qualitative Examination of Pain Centrality Among Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Conflicts
(Oxford, 2017-02) Outcalt, Samantha D.; Nicolaidis, Christina; Bair, Matthew J.; Myers, Laura J.; Miech, Edward J.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Psychology, School of Science
Objective. Centrality of pain refers to the degree to which a patient views chronic pain as integral to his or her life or identity. The purpose of this study was to gain a richer understanding of pain centrality from the perspective of patients who live with chronic pain. Methods. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 26 Veterans with chronic and disabling musculoskeletal pain after completing a stepped care intervention within a randomized controlled trial. Qualitative data were analyzed using an immersion/crystallization approach. We evaluated the role centrality plays in Veterans’ lives and examined whether and how their narratives differ when centrality either significantly decreases or increases after participation in a stepped care intervention for chronic pain. Results. Our data identified three emergent themes that characterized pain centrality: 1) control, 2) acceptance, and 3) preoccupation. We identified five characteristics that distinguished patients’ changes in centrality from baseline: 1) biopsychosocial viewpoint, 2) activity level, 3) pain communication, 4) participation in managing own pain, and 5) social support. Conclusions. This study highlights centrality of pain as an important construct to consider within the overall patient experience of chronic pain.
A critical appraisal of guidelines for electronic communication between patients and clinicians: the need to modernize current recommendations
(Oxford, 2018-04) Lee, Joy L.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Menachemi, Nir; Frankel, Richard M.; Weiner, Michael; Medicine, School of Medicine
Background Patient-provider electronic communication has proliferated in recent years, yet there is a dearth of published research either leading to, or including, recommendations that improve clinical care and prevent unintended negative consequences. We critically appraise published guidelines and suggest an agenda for future work in this area. Objective To understand how existing guidelines align with current practice, evidence, and technology. Methods We performed a narrative review of provider-targeted guidelines for electronic communication between patients and providers, searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases using relevant terms. We limited the search to articles published in English, and manually searched the citations of relevant articles. For each article, we identified and evaluated the suggested practices. Results Across 11 identified guidelines, the primary focus was on technical and administrative concerns, rather than on relational communication. Some of the security practices recommended by the guidelines are no longer needed because of shifts in technology. It is unclear the extent to which the recommendations that are still relevant are being followed. Moreover, there is no guideline-cited evidence of the effectiveness of the practices that have been proposed. Conclusion Our analysis revealed major weaknesses in current guidelines for electronic communication between patients and providers: the guidelines appear to be based on minimal evidence and offer little guidance on how best to use electronic tools to communicate effectively. Further work is needed to systematically evaluate and identify effective practices, create a framework to evaluate quality of communication, and assess the relationship between electronic communication and quality of care.
You and me and the computer makes three: variations in exam room use of the electronic health record
(Oxford University Press, 2014-02) Saleem, Jason J.; Flanagan, Mindy E.; Russ, Alissa L.; McMullen, Carmit K.; Elli, Leora; Russell, Scott A.; Bennett, Katelyn J.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Rehman, Shakaib U.; Schwartz, Mark D.; Frankel, Richard M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
Challenges persist on how to effectively integrate the electronic health record (EHR) into patient visits and clinical workflow, while maintaining patient-centered care. Our goal was to identify variations in, barriers to, and facilitators of the use of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) EHR in ambulatory care workflow in order better to understand how to integrate the EHR into clinical work. We observed and interviewed 20 ambulatory care providers across three geographically distinct VA medical centers. Analysis revealed several variations in, associated barriers to, and facilitators of EHR use corresponding to different units of analysis: computer interface, team coordination/workflow, and organizational. We discuss our findings in the context of different units of analysis and connect variations in EHR use to various barriers and facilitators. Findings from this study may help inform the design of the next generation of EHRs for the VA and other healthcare systems.
Veterans’ Pain Management Goals: Changes During the Course of a Peer-led Pain Self-Management Program
(Elsevier, 2016-12) Bauer, Sarah M.; McGuire, Alan B.; Kukla, Marina; McGuire, Shannon; Bair, Matthew J.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Department of Psychology, School of Science
Objective Goal setting is a common element of self-management support programs; however, little is known about the nature of patients’ goals or how goals change during pain self-management. The purpose of the current study is to explore how patients’ goals and views of goal setting change over the course of a peer-led pain self-management program. Methods Veterans (n = 16) completing a 4-month peer-led pain self-management program completed semi-structured interviews at baseline and follow-up regarding their goals for their pain. Interviews were analyzed using immersion/crystallization. Results Analyses revealed six themes: motivation to do something for their pain, more goal-oriented, actually setting goals, clarity of goal importance, more specific/measurable goal criteria, and more specific/measurable strategies. Conclusion The current analyses illustrate how participants’ goals can evolve over the course of a peer-led pain self-management program. Specifically, increased motivation, more openness to using goals, greater clarity of goal importance, more specific and measurable goals and strategies, and the influence of the peer coach relationship were described by participants. Practice implications Pain self-management interventions should emphasize goal setting, and development of specific, measurable goals and plans. Trainings for providers should address the potential for the provider-patient relationship, particularly peer providers, to facilitate motivation and goal setting.
The Relationship Between Race, Patient Activation, and Working Alliance: Implications for Patient Engagement in Mental Health Care
(Springer, 2016) Eliacin, Johanne; Coffing, Jessica M.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Burgess, Diana J.; Bair, Matthew J.; Rollins, Angela L.; Department of Psychology, School of Science
This study explored the relationship between race and two key aspects of patient engagement—patient activation and working alliance—among a sample of African-American and White veterans (N = 152) seeking medication management for mental health conditions. After adjusting for demographics, race was significantly associated with patient activation, working alliance, and medication adherence scores. Patient activation was also associated with working alliance. These results provide support for the consideration of race and ethnicity in facilitating patient engagement and patient activation in mental healthcare. Minority patients may benefit from targeted efforts to improve their active engagement in mental healthcare.
“I’m Not Gonna Pull the Rug out from under You”: Patient-Provider Communication about Opioid Tapering
(Elsevier, 2017) Matthias, Marianne S.; Johnson, Nicole L.; Shields, Cleveland G.; Bair, Matthew J.; MacKie, Palmer; Huffman, Monica; Alexander, Stewart C.; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine
In response to increases in harms associated with prescription opioids, opioid prescribing has come under greater scrutiny, leading many healthcare organizations and providers to consider or mandate opioid dose reductions (tapering) for patients with chronic pain. Communicating about tapering can be difficult, particularly for patients on long-term opioids who perceive benefits and are using their medications as prescribed. Given the importance of effective patient-provider communication for pain management and recent health system-level initiatives and provider practices to taper opioids, this study used qualitative methods to understand communication processes related to opioid tapering, to identify best practices and opportunities for improvement. Up to 3 clinic visits per patient were audio-recorded, and individual interviews were conducted with patients and their providers. Four major themes emerged: 1) Explaining—Patients needed to understand individualized reasons for tapering, beyond general, population-level concerns such as addiction potential; 2) Negotiating—Patients needed to have input, even if it was simply the rate of tapering; 3) Managing difficult conversations—When patients and providers did not reach a shared understanding, difficulties and misunderstandings arose; 4) Non-abandonment—Patients needed to know that their providers would not abandon them throughout the tapering process.
Barriers to guideline-concordant antibiotic use among inpatient physicians: A case vignette qualitative study
(Wiley, 2016-03) Livorsi, D.; Comer, Amber R.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Perencevich, E.N.; Bair, M.J.; Department of Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
BACKGROUND: Greater adherence to antibiotic-prescribing guidelines may promote more judicious antibiotic use, which could benefit individual patients and society at large. OBJECTIVE: To assess physician knowledge and acceptance of antibiotic-prescribing guidelines through the use of case vignettes. DESIGN: We conducted semistructured interviews with 30 inpatient physicians. Participants were asked to respond to 3 hypothetical case vignettes: (1) a skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), (2) suspected hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and (3) asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). All participants received feedback according to guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and were asked to discuss their level of comfort with following these guidelines. SETTING: Two acute care teaching hospitals for adult patients. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: Data from transcribed interviews were analyzed using emergent thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants were receptive to guidelines and believed they were useful. However, participants' responses to the case vignettes demonstrated that IDSA guideline recommendations were not routinely followed for SSTI, HAP, and ASB. We identified 3 barriers to guideline-concordant care: (1) physicians' lack of awareness of specific guideline recommendations; (2) tension between adhering to guidelines and the desire to individualize patient care; and (3) skepticism of certain guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Case vignettes may be useful tools to assess physician knowledge and acceptance of antibiotic-prescribing guidelines. Using case vignettes, we identified 3 barriers to following IDSA guidelines. Efforts to improve guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing should focus on reducing such barriers at the local level.
Infarct Location and Sleep Apnea: Evaluating the Potential Association in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
(Elsevier, 2015-10) Stahl, Stephanie M.; Yaggi, H. Klar; Taylor, Stanley; Qin, Li; Ivan, Cristina S.; Austin, Charles; Ferguson, Jared; Radulescu, Radu; Tobias, Lauren; Sico, Jason; Vaz Fragoso, Carlos A.; Williams, Linda S.; Lampert, Rachel; Miech, Edward J.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Kapoor, John; Bravata, Dawn M.; Department of Neurology, IU School of Medicine
Background: The literature about the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and stroke location is conflicting with some studies finding an association and others demonstrating no relationship. Among acute ischemic stroke patients, we sought to examine the relationship between stroke location and the prevalence of OSA; OSA severity based on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), arousal frequency, and measure of hypoxia; and number of central and obstructive respiratory events. Methods: Data were obtained from patients who participated in a randomized controlled trial (NCT01446913) that evaluated the effectiveness of a strategy of diagnosing and treating OSA among patients with acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke location was classified by brain imaging reports into subdivisions of lobes, subcortical areas, brainstem, cerebellum, and vascular territory. The association between acute stroke location and polysomnographic findings was evaluated using logistic regression for OSA presence and negative binomial regression for AHI. Results: Among 73 patients with complete polysomnography and stroke location data, 58 (79%) had OSA. In unadjusted models, no stroke location variable was associated with the prevalence or severity of OSA. Similarly, in multivariable modeling, groupings of stroke location were also not associated with OSA presence. Conclusions: These results indicate that OSA is present in the majority of stroke patients and imply that stroke location cannot be used to identify a group with higher risk of OSA. The results also suggest that OSA likely predated the stroke. Given this high overall prevalence, strong consideration should be given to obtaining polysomnography for all ischemic stroke patients.
Exploring Clinician Perceptions of a Veteran Peer Support Intervention to Inform Implementation
(Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2016-04-08) Shue, Sarah; Bair, Matt; Matthias, Marianne S.
Introduction Chronic pain affects a large number of veterans and negatively impacts their quality of life. To address chronic pain, peer support models have been utilized and show promising results. ECLIPSE (Evaluation of a Coach--‐Led Intervention to Improve Pain Symptoms) is focused on a peer support intervention that involves peer delivery of pain self--‐management strategies for veterans dealing with chronic musculoskeletal pain. This intervention aims to positively impact overall pain levels, as well as self--‐efficacy, social support, pain coping, patient activation, health--‐related quality of life, and health service utilization. The current study serves the pre--‐implementation aim of ECLIPSE; the purpose of this study was to explore clinician perceptions regarding ECLIPSE to inform implementation into VA clinics. Methods This study utilized a qualitative approach to interview clinicians at a single US VA Medical Center. A research assistant conducted individual, in--‐person, semi--‐structured interviews with clinicians, which fulfills the third aim of a larger research project. Analysis consisted of developing descriptive coding and themes emerged through the evaluation of coded segments. Results Preliminary results for n=9 (second round of interviews to be completed in the summer) have revealed 4 themes. Clinicians: i) have an overall positive view of this type of intervention; ii) believe peer coaches should be properly selected and supported; iii) have valuable feedback on aspects of implementing and maintaining this type of intervention within clinics; and iv) have considerations for maximizing intervention utility. Conclusions Interventions that involve peer coaching may be incredibly beneficial for those suffering with chronic pain. However, to determine the ease of implementation of these types of interventions into clinic settings, understanding clinician viewpoints is a necessary aspect to ensure success. Feedback collected in this study can also facilitate implementation on a broader scale, allowing more veterans to benefit from this peer support intervention.

Browse

Recent Submissions